NO could deny king is the best form of head in term of brain to the body. The effectiveness of king subjects system was the most formed as it lasted from the beginning of our species. The problem is who is going to be king? He is either the strongest or the cleverest, either truth-worthy or luckiest one. It works in a small group. It never works long in a big group. Other forms of systems have been developed through history. Nevertheless you could still see king or queen in some country. It does not say they are bad. But go back to first questions, is the inherited monarch recognised by the subjects? If you read history book. It never works. Laziness, greediness, short-sighted-eye of the monarch is never the best ruler. If there is a natural competition, the group are limited to numbers of prince. The right of succession are designed to give their blood type. If their subjects have jobs to do, have food to eat, have some movies to watch, why they want to rebel? This is a question Gaddafi did not understand. You may be not sure as well, nor him, a guy has 1 million being frozen by UK, global 80 billions value is estimated. No wonder why he does not understand, he is not part of the group, subjects, he rules. He is different. If he is different, how about Abdullah, the Saudi king of 86 years old. He took Gaddafi’s lession, realised money was not that important. Hence he released 34 billions welfare reform. But the subjects will let him but their bill once? We never know. But one thing is clear that welfare system could not benefit those who need benefit. For example, beggars are poor. But welfare system never touches them. Those people, usually young, are the unrest one. They the next ruling generation. They will rule this earth. They could not if the current rule does not give them a chance. In China, a civil service was developed. Subjects knows how to get their hand on the fresh meat. It is a fair system, also unfair. Through an fair way to perform unfair competition. It will never work. But are there any better way? The better way is the other way. First, the product of human are unlimited; second, the countries should be split into very small units; all the control is effective; movement of person are equalized. If we apply those condition into the future human management whether it is ruled by human or machines. These rules shall be inherited down like Isaac Asimov’s three robot rule.